kunstenkamp/.agents/skills/vercel-composition-patterns/rules/state-decouple-implementation.md

title, impact, impactDescription, tags

title	impact	impactDescription	tags
Decouple State Management from UI	MEDIUM	enables swapping state implementations without changing UI	composition, state, architecture

Decouple State Management from UI

The provider component should be the only place that knows how state is managed. UI components consume the context interface—they don't know if state comes from useState, Zustand, or a server sync.

Incorrect (UI coupled to state implementation):

function ChannelComposer({ channelId }: { channelId: string }) {
  // UI component knows about global state implementation
  const state = useGlobalChannelState(channelId);
  const { submit, updateInput } = useChannelSync(channelId);

  return (
    <Composer.Frame>
      <Composer.Input value={state.input} onChange={(text) => sync.updateInput(text)} />
      <Composer.Submit onPress={() => sync.submit()} />
    </Composer.Frame>
  );
}

Correct (state management isolated in provider):

// Provider handles all state management details
function ChannelProvider({
  channelId,
  children,
}: {
  channelId: string;
  children: React.ReactNode;
}) {
  const { state, update, submit } = useGlobalChannel(channelId);
  const inputRef = useRef(null);

  return (
    <Composer.Provider state={state} actions={{ update, submit }} meta={{ inputRef }}>
      {children}
    </Composer.Provider>
  );
}

// UI component only knows about the context interface
function ChannelComposer() {
  return (
    <Composer.Frame>
      <Composer.Header />
      <Composer.Input />
      <Composer.Footer>
        <Composer.Submit />
      </Composer.Footer>
    </Composer.Frame>
  );
}

// Usage
function Channel({ channelId }: { channelId: string }) {
  return (
    <ChannelProvider channelId={channelId}>
      <ChannelComposer />
    </ChannelProvider>
  );
}

Different providers, same UI:

// Local state for ephemeral forms
function ForwardMessageProvider({ children }) {
  const [state, setState] = useState(initialState);
  const forwardMessage = useForwardMessage();

  return (
    <Composer.Provider state={state} actions={{ update: setState, submit: forwardMessage }}>
      {children}
    </Composer.Provider>
  );
}

// Global synced state for channels
function ChannelProvider({ channelId, children }) {
  const { state, update, submit } = useGlobalChannel(channelId);

  return (
    <Composer.Provider state={state} actions={{ update, submit }}>
      {children}
    </Composer.Provider>
  );
}

The same Composer.Input component works with both providers because it only depends on the context interface, not the implementation.